Viewport 05 · Composite Dashboard

Composite Dashboard

The 40,000-dentist / 61-follower gap, the two weakest scores, the funder categories AGDF has not approached, and the repositioning, with the eight public numbers behind every claim.

All four upstream viewports on one screen

?How to read this

Every upstream viewport, compressed. The network topology with its biggest gap, the gap severity bars, the five-dimension pentagon with composite 45.0, the funder categories AGDF is silent in, and the eight public numbers. Each number traces to a public source.

Topics in the conversation

Gaps

45.0

SAS Composite

40,000

Member dentists

Sources

Instagram followers

VP01 · Network Topology

VP02 · Gap Severity

VP03 · Structural Advantage Pentagon

VP04 · Funder Categories AGDF Is Silent In

The Numbers · 8 Sources

Method

Public-web evidence: agdfoundation.org, ProPublica EIN 23-7310583, peer-foundation 990s and annual reports (ADA Foundation, AAPD Foundation, AAOF, AAOMS Foundation, Oral Cancer Foundation, HNCA, SPOHNC), Charity Navigator, Giving USA 2025, NIH and CDC oral-cancer epidemiology, and social-media follower counts confirmed 2026-05-06. No transcripts. No interviews. We compared the public conversation about dental philanthropy and oral cancer prevention against named peer foundations.

Read the Editor’s Letter →

AGDF owns the workforce that performs three out of four oral cancer screenings in America. In the public conversation about dental philanthropy and oral cancer prevention, foundation and cancer are the words it turns toward; AGDF stays at the edge. Five gaps stay open while AGDF says nothing. Its Structural Advantage Score is 45.0 of 100, with Cause-Frame Multiplicity and Donor Pipeline Diversity the two scores to raise. The four funder categories its workforce qualifies for are Cancer Prevention, HPV Vaccination, Health Equity, and Project 200 Mouths. Every claim traces to a public number.

Viewports5

SAS Composite45.0

Sources8

The ratio40,000 / 61